Skip to content
Frost & Fender
Roundup

The best portable jump starters, bought by engine size rather than peak amps

The cheapest unit here publishes a higher engine rating than the one costing three times as much. That is not a bargain finding - it is a warning about how little these headline numbers can be compared.

By Scooter M.Published September 15, 2026

Heads up: the buy links on this page are affiliate links. If you buy through one, we earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It does not change what we recommend or the order we rank things in - here is how we keep those separate.

The shortlist

Ranked, with the prices

Ranked on published manufacturer specifications and, where the numbers exist, the arithmetic on what each option costs and what it saves. Tap any row for the full write-up, including who should skip it.

#ProductBest forScorePrice
01Schumacher Schumacher SL1639 Lithium Jump Starter and Power PackSchumacher SL1639 Lithium Jump Starter and Power PackThe car that has already left you stranded onceBest for most cars8.6$52.99 - View on Amazon
02NOCO NOCO Boost Sport GB20 Jump StarterNOCO Boost Sport GB20 Jump StarterA small gas engine, a motorcycle, a mower - and a glovebox rather than a trunkSmallest to carry8.1$79.95 - View on Amazon
03Schumacher Schumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Jump Starter and Power PackSchumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Jump Starter and Power PackLarger gas engines and diesels, or a household covering several vehicles with one unitMost stored energy8.5$108.94 - View on Amazon

Scores are ours and editorial. They are never published as review or rating markup, because we have not tested these products - see how we pick.

The number on the box is the wrong number

Every jump starter listing leads with peak amps. It is a large, impressive, unregulated figure, and shopping on it is how people end up with a unit that cannot start their car.

Here is the evidence, from one maker’s own published figures. Schumacher rates the SL1639 at 1000 peak amps and the SL1674 at 1500 — half again as much. Yet it publishes the same 8.0 liter gas engine rating for both. Fifty percent more peak amps, no additional published engine capability, and roughly twice the price.

That does not mean the cheap one is secretly better. It means something more useful: these ratings are declared by each manufacturer with no common test standard behind them, so they do not compare across brands at all. Within one brand they are genuinely informative — NOCO’s own range runs 4.0, then 7.0 liters of gas as you go up it, and that ordering tells you something real. Across brands, treat them as a bracket, never as a ranking.

How we judged these

1. Engine displacement rating, first. It is the only published figure that maps to your actual car. NOCO states a gas rating and a diesel rating for each model, and on the GB20 the diesel entry reads “Not Recommended” — which is a manufacturer telling you, in writing, not to buy it for that job.

2. Watt-hours, second. This is the one figure on the page that does compare across brands, because a watt-hour is a physical unit rather than a marketing one. Stored energy is what survives repeated cranking: peak amps describes an instant, watt-hours describe how many instants you get. Here that runs 24 Wh on the GB20, 29.6 on the SL1639 and 37 on the SL1674.

3. What the maker refuses to publish. And here every unit on this page fails the same test, so it is worth saying plainly: none of them publishes an operating temperature range. On a device whose entire purpose happens on a freezing morning, and on a site that ranks battery maintainers largely on their published cold rating, that is a real gap. Lithium cells deliver less when cold. The makers know this and none of them puts a number on it.

4. Ingress protection. All three publish IP65, which matters for a device used at the roadside in weather rather than in a workshop.

What each maker publishes - note that the engine ratings are not cross-comparable
Schumacher SL1639NOCO GB20Schumacher SL1674
Peak current1000 A500 A1500 A
Gas engine ratingUp to 8.0 LUp to 4.0 LUp to 8.0 L
Diesel engine ratingUp to 6.0 LNot RecommendedUp to 4.5 L
Internal battery29.6 Wh24 Wh37 Wh
Ingress protectionNot publishedIP65IP65
Operating temperature rangeNot publishedNot publishedNot published

What it is actually competing against

A jump starter is not a value purchase in the way most things on this site are, and it would be dishonest to pretend the arithmetic is tidy. It does not prevent anything. It rescues you after the thing has already happened.

The comparison is against a roadside call-out, which you pay once and remember, and against the hour or three of waiting for one in weather. Against that, a two-figure device in the trunk is easy to justify — particularly for anyone who parks where nobody will be along with jumper cables.

But the honest ordering is this: a maintainer is the better purchase first. NOCO publishes a 15 W maximum draw for the GENIUS1, which even run flat out for a 120-day winter is about $7.92 at the U.S. average residential rate of 18.34 cents per kWh (EIA, June 2026). That prevents the flat battery. The jump starter handles the morning the prevention was not in place, or the battery finally aged out.

Both, if you can. The maintainer first, if you cannot. We separate those two jobs in full here.

Skip this

Skip the 8000-amp unit that costs less than dinner

Search this category and you will find units advertising 6000 or 8000 peak amps for under sixty dollars — numbers several times what an established maker claims for a device costing three times as much.

We are not going to make a claim about what those units can or cannot do, because we have not tested them and nobody has published figures we could check. That is exactly the point. What we can say is what is disclosed: NOCO publishes a peak amp figure and a watt-hour capacity and a gas engine displacement rating and a diesel rating and an IP rating. Schumacher publishes four of those five for the SL1639 and no ingress rating, which we mark as unpublished on its entry. The sub-sixty-dollar units we found publish a peak amp number and little else.

You cannot compare a disclosed specification with an undisclosed one, and a peak-amp figure with no capacity behind it is not a specification — it is a headline. Buy from whoever will tell you what is inside the box.

The air compressor question

A lot of people search for a jump starter with a built-in tire inflator, and it is a reasonable thing to want: the two roadside problems arrive from the same kind of morning, and one device in the trunk beats two.

The honest position is that the combination units split sharply. The ones from makers that publish full specifications sit at roughly triple the price of a plain jump starter of similar capability. The cheap ones are the same undisclosed-specification units as above, now with a compressor attached and a second headline number.

If you want both functions, our suggestion is to buy them separately rather than reaching for the cheap combo: a jump starter whose numbers you can check, and a separate inflator. It is two things in the trunk instead of one, and it is the version where you know what you bought. The inflators we would pair with one are ranked on the same basis: what the maker is willing to publish.

Living with it, which is where most of these fail

Charge it before the season, and again mid-winter. A lithium jump starter self-discharges on the shelf. The classic failure in this category is not the device being too small — it is the device being flat on the morning you finally need it, eighteen months after you bought it and put it in the trunk.

Think about where it lives. Lithium cells deliver less when cold, and none of these publishes a figure for how much. A unit stored in a freezing trunk all winter is being asked to perform at its worst exactly when you need it at its best. Indoors, or in the cabin, is measurably better treatment even if nobody will put a number on how much better.

Do not use it to keep a dying battery going. This is the real trap. A jump starter makes it possible to keep restarting a battery that should have been replaced in October, right up until the morning it strands you somewhere worse. A battery that cranks slowly in the cold is telling you something, and the jump pack is not the answer to it.

What we would buy

For an ordinary gas car: the Schumacher SL1639. It is the cheapest unit here, it publishes both of the figures that decide this purchase, and 29.6 watt-hours is more stored energy than the smaller NOCO carries. The trade is that Schumacher publishes no ingress rating where NOCO publishes IP65, and this is a device used at the roadside in weather.

For a small gas engine, a bike or a mower: the GB20, and note the ceiling rather than discovering it. Published to 4.0 liters of gas, published as not recommended for diesel at all, and the smallest of the three to actually carry.

For an electric car, the sizing logic on this page does not apply at all: there is no engine to crank, so peak amps stop mattering and the pack only has to wake the 12-volt system. What the manufacturers publish about jump starting an EV is a separate page, including the detail that an EV cannot be used to jump start anyone else.

For a diesel or a large gas engine: the SL1674, which carries the most stored energy here at 37 watt-hours and adds an IP65 rating and a published two-year warranty that the cheaper Schumacher does not have. Published to 4.5 liters of diesel and 8.0 of gas — and because it comes from the same maker as our top pick, those two engine ratings are directly comparable with each other.

And in every case, the thing that stops you needing it is the cheaper purchase. The maintainer roundup is here, and a maintainer is the item we would buy first for any car that sits.

The write-ups

Every pick, in full

01 / Best for most carsSchumacher Schumacher SL1639 Lithium Jump Starter and Power Pack

Schumacher

8.6 / 10

The cheapest jump starter on this page

Schumacher SL1639 Lithium Jump Starter and Power Pack

A lithium jump pack that starts a dead car without a second vehicle, and the one here that publishes the most capability for the least money: 1000 peak amps, 29.6 watt-hours, and engine ratings of 8.0 liters gas and 6.0 diesel. It solves the emergency; it does not solve the cause, which is why it belongs beside a maintainer rather than instead of one.

$52.99 - View on Amazon

#ad Price as of October 18, 2026, from Amazon. Prices change. How this site is funded.

Published specifications for the Schumacher SL1639 Lithium Jump Starter and Power Pack, with the source of each
SpecificationPublished valueWhere it is published
Peak current1000 peak ampsSchumacher SL1639 Lithium Portable Power Pack and 1000 Peak Amp 12V Jump Starter - published product page
Voltage12 VSchumacher SL1639 Lithium Portable Power Pack and 1000 Peak Amp 12V Jump Starter - published product page
Engine ratingPublished as strong enough to jump start up to 8.0 L gas and 6.0 L diesel enginesSchumacher SL1639 Lithium Portable Power Pack and 1000 Peak Amp 12V Jump Starter - published product page
Internal battery29.6 watt-hour lithium-ionSchumacher SL1639 Lithium Portable Power Pack and 1000 Peak Amp 12V Jump Starter - published product page
Jump starts per chargePublished as up to 30 on a single chargeSchumacher SL1639 Lithium Portable Power Pack and 1000 Peak Amp 12V Jump Starter - published product page
Recharge time2.5 to 4 hours with the supplied USB charging cableSchumacher SL1639 Lithium Portable Power Pack and 1000 Peak Amp 12V Jump Starter - published product page
SafetySmart clamps published as protecting against reverse polarity, short circuit, battery exhausted, high temperature and reverse chargingSchumacher SL1639 Lithium Portable Power Pack and 1000 Peak Amp 12V Jump Starter - published product page
Secondary functionTwo USB output ports (2.4 A and 3.0 A) and an LCD displaySchumacher SL1639 Lithium Portable Power Pack and 1000 Peak Amp 12V Jump Starter - published product page
Ingress protectionNot published by the manufacturerSchumacher SL1639 Lithium Portable Power Pack and 1000 Peak Amp 12V Jump Starter - published product page
Operating temperature rangeNot published by the manufacturerSchumacher SL1639 Lithium Portable Power Pack and 1000 Peak Amp 12V Jump Starter - published product page

What it does well

  • Publishes both of the figures that actually decide this purchase - engine displacement and watt-hours - at the lowest price here
  • 29.6 watt-hours is more stored energy than either of the smaller NOCO units carry
  • Smart clamps published as protecting against reverse polarity, short circuit and reverse charging

What it does not

  • No published ingress protection rating, which both NOCO units do publish - and this is a device used at the roadside in weather
  • No published operating temperature range, on a product whose whole job happens on a cold morning
  • It treats the symptom - the maintainer treats the cause

Skip this one if

The battery is simply old. A jump pack is a way to keep restarting a battery you should be replacing.

How it scores, by criterion

Gets you moving9.0
Published data8.0
Engine coverage9.0
Portability8.5
Price9.0
02 / Smallest to carryNOCO NOCO Boost Sport GB20 Jump Starter

NOCO

8.1 / 10

The cheapest way into a jump starter that publishes its numbers

NOCO Boost Sport GB20 Jump Starter

The cheapest NOCO, and the published specifications are the reason to think carefully rather than just buy the small one: it is rated for a 4.0 liter gas engine and, in NOCO's own words, is not recommended for diesel at all.

$79.95 - View on Amazon

#ad Price as of October 18, 2026, from Amazon. Prices change. How this site is funded.

What it does well

  • Published engine ratings and watt-hour capacity, which the cheap end of this category does not give you
  • Small enough to live in a glovebox rather than a trunk, which is where it will actually be
  • Same spark-proof, reverse-polarity-protected clamp design as the bigger units

What it does not

  • Diesel is published as Not Recommended - if you drive one, this model is simply not for you
  • 4.0 liters of gas engine is a real ceiling, and a cold V6 at the top of it is asking a lot
  • No published operating temperature range, on a device whose whole job happens in the cold

Skip this one if

You drive a diesel, or anything with a large gas engine. NOCO publishes 'Not Recommended' for diesel on this model, and that is not a hedge worth arguing with.

How it scores, by criterion

Gets you moving7.5
Published data9.0
Engine coverage6.0
Portability9.5
Price8.5
03 / Most stored energySchumacher Schumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Jump Starter and Power Pack

Schumacher

8.5 / 10

Around twice the price of the smaller Schumacher

Schumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Jump Starter and Power Pack

The most stored energy on this page: Schumacher publishes a 37 watt-hour four-cell battery, against 29.6 in its own smaller unit. Capacity is what does the work on the second and third attempt, and because it is the same maker as our top pick, the engine ratings here are directly comparable rather than marketing against a rival's scale.

$108.94 - View on Amazon

#ad Price as of October 18, 2026, from Amazon. Prices change. How this site is funded.

Published specifications for the Schumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Jump Starter and Power Pack, with the source of each
SpecificationPublished valueWhere it is published
Peak current1500 ASchumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Lithium Jump Starter and Portable Power Pack - published product page (1500 A peak, 8.0 L gas / 4.5 L diesel, 37 Wh, IP65)
Gas engine ratingUp to 8.0 litersSchumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Lithium Jump Starter and Portable Power Pack - published product page (1500 A peak, 8.0 L gas / 4.5 L diesel, 37 Wh, IP65)
Diesel engine ratingUp to 4.5 litersSchumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Lithium Jump Starter and Portable Power Pack - published product page (1500 A peak, 8.0 L gas / 4.5 L diesel, 37 Wh, IP65)
Internal battery37 Wh four-cell lithium-ion polymerSchumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Lithium Jump Starter and Portable Power Pack - published product page (1500 A peak, 8.0 L gas / 4.5 L diesel, 37 Wh, IP65)
Ingress protectionIP65Schumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Lithium Jump Starter and Portable Power Pack - published product page (1500 A peak, 8.0 L gas / 4.5 L diesel, 37 Wh, IP65)
Recharge time4-5 hoursSchumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Lithium Jump Starter and Portable Power Pack - published product page (1500 A peak, 8.0 L gas / 4.5 L diesel, 37 Wh, IP65)
Weight1.99 lbSchumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Lithium Jump Starter and Portable Power Pack - published product page (1500 A peak, 8.0 L gas / 4.5 L diesel, 37 Wh, IP65)
ProtectionReverse polarity and overload protectionSchumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Lithium Jump Starter and Portable Power Pack - published product page (1500 A peak, 8.0 L gas / 4.5 L diesel, 37 Wh, IP65)
Warranty2 year limitedSchumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Lithium Jump Starter and Portable Power Pack - published product page (1500 A peak, 8.0 L gas / 4.5 L diesel, 37 Wh, IP65)
Operating temperature rangeNot published by the manufacturerSchumacher SL1674 4-in-1 Lithium Jump Starter and Portable Power Pack - published product page (1500 A peak, 8.0 L gas / 4.5 L diesel, 37 Wh, IP65)

What it does well

  • 37 Wh is the most stored energy here, and stored energy is what survives repeated attempts
  • Published for 8.0 liters of gas and 4.5 of diesel, on the same scale as our top pick
  • IP65 rating and a published 2-year warranty, both of which the smaller unit lacks

What it does not

  • Roughly twice the price of the smaller Schumacher for headroom most drivers never use
  • The wireless charging pad is cabin-gadget value, not jump-starting value
  • No published operating temperature range, which is the figure a cold-start buyer most wants

Skip this one if

Your car is a normal gas hatchback or sedan. You are paying for headroom and a wireless charging pad you will not use.

How it scores, by criterion

Gets you moving9.5
Published data9.5
Engine coverage9.5
Portability7.5
Price5.5

How this was ranked

Every site in this category says it tested twenty of these. We have not tested any, and we say so. What we did instead: built the candidate set from what Amazon actually stocks, compiled the published specifications from each manufacturer’s own pages, did the arithmetic on running cost and on what the thing prevents, and read owner reviews for failure patterns rather than star averages. Every number on this page has a link to where it was published, so you can check the work.

Units we claim to have tested
0
Sponsored placements
0
Free products accepted
0

The full method, including what we refuse to claim

Questions people actually ask

Frequently asked

What happened to the NOCO GB40? It used to be your top pick.

It was, and we removed it on 2026-09-14 because its Amazon listing went to “Currently unavailable” with no other live listing for the same unit. To be clear about what that is and is not: NOCO has not discontinued the GB40 and still publishes its specification sheet — it is the Amazon listing we link to that has no seller. We do not leave buy buttons pointing at listings you cannot buy from, so the slot went to the Schumacher SL1639, which is verified in stock and publishes comparable figures. If the GB40 comes back we will reassess it on the same criteria as everything else.

How many amps do I need in a jump starter?

Peak amps is the wrong specification to shop on. Use the published engine displacement rating instead - NOCO publishes up to 4.0 liters of gas for the GB20, and Schumacher publishes 8.0 liters for both the SL1639 and the SL1674 - but only compare those figures within a brand, because there is no common test standard behind them. Across brands, watt-hours is the honest comparison.

Is a bigger peak amp number always better?

No, and this lineup proves it. Schumacher rates the SL1639 at 1000 peak amps and the SL1674 at 1500, yet publishes the same 8.0 liter gas engine rating for both - the extra peak amps buy no additional published engine capability. Peak amps describes a single instant; watt-hours describe how many instants you get, and that runs 24, 29.6 and 37 across the three units here.

Do jump starters work in very cold weather?

Lithium cells deliver less when cold, and the honest answer is that none of these manufacturers publishes an operating temperature range - which we record as unpublished on every entry rather than guessing. Practically: keep it charged, and store it somewhere warmer than a freezing trunk if you can.

Can a portable jump starter replace a battery maintainer?

No - they solve opposite ends of the same problem. A maintainer prevents the flat battery, for a published 15 W maximum draw that works out under eight dollars across a whole winter. A jump starter rescues you afterwards. If you only buy one, buy the maintainer. The two jobs are separated here.

Are the cheap 8000-amp jump starters any good?

We have not tested them and nobody has published figures we could check, which is itself the finding. Established makers publish peak amps and watt-hour capacity and gas and diesel engine ratings and an IP rating. The sub-sixty-dollar units we found publish a peak amp number and little else, and you cannot compare a disclosed specification with an undisclosed one.

Should I buy a jump starter with a built-in air compressor?

If you want both functions, we would buy them separately. The combo units from makers that publish full specifications run to roughly triple the price of a plain jump starter; the cheap combos are the same undisclosed-specification products with a compressor bolted on. Two items in the trunk, but you know what each one is.

Sources

Read next